Langue de bœuf sauce piquante vs Langue de boeuf sauce madère
Overall, Langue de bœuf sauce piquante has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Langue de bœuf sauce piquant... | Langue de boeuf sauce madère |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 105 kcal | 189 kcal |
| Fat | 4.6 g | 14.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 7.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 2.1 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | — |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Langue de bœuf sauce piquante has 44% fewer calories (105 kcal vs 189 kcal).
- Langue de bœuf sauce piquante has 69% less fat (4.6 g vs 14.7 g).
- Langue de bœuf sauce piquante has 76% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 7.2 g).
- Langue de bœuf sauce piquante has 67% less sugar (0.7 g vs 2.1 g).
- Langue de boeuf sauce madère has 89% more protein (10 g vs 1.1 g).
- Langue de bœuf sauce piquante has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Langue de boeuf sauce madère lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Langue de bœuf sauce piquante
Not available.
Langue de boeuf sauce madère
Langue de bœuf (46%). Sauce (54%) : eau filtrée, farine de blé, oignons, beurre, saindoux, armagnac, madère (4%), vinaigre, sel de Guérande 1.8%, sucre, vin blanc, sel, arômes naturels
FAQ
Which is healthier: Langue de bœuf sauce piquante or Langue de boeuf sauce madère?
Overall, Langue de bœuf sauce piquante has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Langue de bœuf sauce piquante has fewer calories: 105 kcal versus 189 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Langue de bœuf sauce piquante has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.