Comparison

Langue De Boeuf Sauce Madere vs Arrosto di manzo

Overall, Arrosto di manzo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLangue De Boeuf Sauce MadereArrosto di manzo
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 189 kcal 98 kcal
Fat 14.7 g 2 g
Saturated fat 7.2 g 1 g
Sugars 2.1 g 0.6 g
Salt 1.1 g 1.9 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 10 g 19 g
Additives02
AllergensGluten, Milk, MustardNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Arrosto di manzo has 48% fewer calories (98 kcal vs 189 kcal).
  • Arrosto di manzo has 86% less fat (2 g vs 14.7 g).
  • Arrosto di manzo has 86% less saturated fat (1 g vs 7.2 g).
  • Arrosto di manzo has 71% less sugar (0.6 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Langue De Boeuf Sauce Madere has 42% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Arrosto di manzo has 47% more protein (19 g vs 10 g).
  • Arrosto di manzo has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Langue De Boeuf Sauce Madere lists: Gluten, Milk, Mustard.

Ingredients

Langue De Boeuf Sauce Madere

Langue de bœuf (46%). Sauce (54%) : eau filtrée, farine de _blé_, oignons, _beurre_, saindoux, armagnac, madère (4%), vinaigre, sel de Guérande (1.8%), sucre, vin blanc, sel, arômes naturels (dont _moutarde_). Pourcentages exprimés sur la sauce

Arrosto di manzo

Carne di bovino, sale, destrosio, aromi naturali, piante aromatiche, antiossidante: ascorbato di sodio; conservante: nitrito di sodio. SENZA GLUTINE. SENZA LATTOSIO.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Langue De Boeuf Sauce Madere or Arrosto di manzo?

Overall, Arrosto di manzo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Arrosto di manzo has fewer calories: 98 kcal versus 189 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Arrosto di manzo has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons