Beef Snack Sticks vs Arrosto di manzo
Overall, Arrosto di manzo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Beef Snack Sticks | Arrosto di manzo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 262 kcal | 98 kcal |
| Fat | 18.8 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.1 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 22.4 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Beef, Celery | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Arrosto di manzo has 63% fewer calories (98 kcal vs 262 kcal).
- Arrosto di manzo has 89% less fat (2 g vs 18.8 g).
- Arrosto di manzo has 86% less saturated fat (1 g vs 7.1 g).
- Beef Snack Sticks has no sugar, while Arrosto di manzo has 0.6 g.
- Beef Snack Sticks has 15% more protein (22.4 g vs 19 g).
- Arrosto di manzo has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Beef Snack Sticks lists: Beef, Celery.
Ingredients
Beef Snack Sticks
BEEF, WATER CONTAINS 2% OR LESS: SEA SALT, CELERY POWDER, VINEGAR, GARLIC, NATURAL FLAVORS, IN NATURAL SHEEP CASING.
Arrosto di manzo
Carne di bovino, sale, destrosio, aromi naturali, piante aromatiche, antiossidante: ascorbato di sodio; conservante: nitrito di sodio. SENZA GLUTINE. SENZA LATTOSIO.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Beef Snack Sticks or Arrosto di manzo?
Overall, Arrosto di manzo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Arrosto di manzo has fewer calories: 98 kcal versus 262 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Beef Snack Sticks has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.