Langue de boeuf sauce madère vs Langue de boeuf sauce madère
Overall, Langue de boeuf sauce madère has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Langue de boeuf sauce madère | Langue de boeuf sauce madère |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 132 kcal | 189 kcal |
| Fat | 7.7 g | 14.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 7.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 2.1 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Milk, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Langue de boeuf sauce madère has 30% fewer calories (132 kcal vs 189 kcal).
- Langue de boeuf sauce madère has 48% less fat (7.7 g vs 14.7 g).
- Langue de boeuf sauce madère has 61% less saturated fat (2.8 g vs 7.2 g).
- Langue de boeuf sauce madère has 48% less sugar (1.1 g vs 2.1 g).
- Langue de boeuf sauce madère has 48% less salt (1.1 g vs 2.1 g).
- Langue de boeuf sauce madère has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Only Langue de boeuf sauce madère lists: Gluten, Milk, Mustard.
Ingredients
Langue de boeuf sauce madère
Not available.
Langue de boeuf sauce madère
Langue de boeuf (46%) - Sauce (54%) : eau filtrée, farine de blé, oignons, beurre,saindoux, armagnac, madère(4%), vinaigre, sel de Guérande (1,8%), sucre, vin blanc, sel, arômes naturels (dont moutarde)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Langue de boeuf sauce madère or Langue de boeuf sauce madère?
Overall, Langue de boeuf sauce madère has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Langue de boeuf sauce madère has fewer calories: 132 kcal versus 189 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Langue de boeuf sauce madère has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.