Lambrusco reggiano vs Chianti Rufina
Overall, Lambrusco reggiano has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lambrusco reggiano | Chianti Rufina |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 11 kcal | 73 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 15.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lambrusco reggiano has 85% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 73 kcal).
- Lambrusco reggiano has 96% less sugar (0.6 g vs 15.5 g).
- Chianti Rufina has 86% more protein (0.7 g vs 0.1 g).
Ingredients
Lambrusco reggiano
Not available.
Chianti Rufina
fermented grape juice
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lambrusco reggiano or Chianti Rufina?
Overall, Lambrusco reggiano has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lambrusco reggiano has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 73 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lambrusco reggiano has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 15.5 g per 100 g.