Comparison
Lambrusco Emilia vs Chianti Rufina
Overall, Lambrusco Emilia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lambrusco Emilia | Chianti Rufina |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 71 kcal | 73 kcal |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 15 g | 15.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lambrusco Emilia has 36% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0.9 g).
Ingredients
Lambrusco Emilia
Uva nera
Chianti Rufina
fermented grape juice
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lambrusco Emilia or Chianti Rufina?
Overall, Lambrusco Emilia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lambrusco Emilia has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 73 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lambrusco Emilia has less sugar: 15 g versus 15.5 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Lambrusco vs Chianti Rufina
Gewürztraminer Alto Adig... vs Chianti Rufina
Chianti Rufina vs Giaro nero d'Avola - per...
Chianti Rufina vs Teroldego rotaliano
Lambrusco dell'Emilia Ro... vs Lambrusco Emilia
Lambrusco vs Lambrusco Emilia
Lambrusco Emilia vs Gewürztraminer Alto Adig...
Lambrusco Emilia vs Giaro nero d'Avola - per...