Lambrusco vs Lambrusco Emilia
Overall, Lambrusco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lambrusco | Lambrusco Emilia |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 11 kcal | 71 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 15 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lambrusco has 85% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 71 kcal).
- Lambrusco has no fat, while Lambrusco Emilia has 0.4 g.
- Lambrusco has 96% less sugar (0.6 g vs 15 g).
- Lambrusco Emilia has 100% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0 g).
- Lambrusco Emilia has 89% more protein (0.6 g vs 0.1 g).
Ingredients
Lambrusco
Rotwein
Lambrusco Emilia
Uva nera
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lambrusco or Lambrusco Emilia?
Overall, Lambrusco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lambrusco has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 71 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lambrusco has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 15 g per 100 g.