Comparison
Lambrusco Emilia vs Teroldego rotaliano
Overall, Teroldego rotaliano has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lambrusco Emilia | Teroldego rotaliano |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 71 kcal | 11 kcal |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 15 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Teroldego rotaliano has 85% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 71 kcal).
- Teroldego rotaliano has no fat, while Lambrusco Emilia has 0.4 g.
- Teroldego rotaliano has 96% less sugar (0.6 g vs 15 g).
- Lambrusco Emilia has 100% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0 g).
- Lambrusco Emilia has 100% more protein (0.6 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Lambrusco Emilia
Uva nera
Teroldego rotaliano
VINO ROSSO
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lambrusco Emilia or Teroldego rotaliano?
Overall, Teroldego rotaliano has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Teroldego rotaliano has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 71 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Teroldego rotaliano has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 15 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Gewürztraminer Alto Adig... vs Teroldego rotaliano
Teroldego rotaliano vs Giaro nero d'Avola - per...
Chianti Rufina vs Teroldego rotaliano
Lambrusco dell'Emilia Ro... vs Lambrusco Emilia
Lambrusco vs Lambrusco Emilia
Lambrusco Emilia vs Gewürztraminer Alto Adig...
Lambrusco Emilia vs Giaro nero d'Avola - per...
Lambrusco Emilia vs Chianti Rufina