Lambrusco dell'Emilia Rosato vs Chianti Rufina
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Lambrusco dell'Emilia Rosato | Chianti Rufina |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 21 kcal | 73 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 15.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lambrusco dell'Emilia Rosato has 71% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 73 kcal).
- Lambrusco dell'Emilia Rosato has 71% less sugar (4.5 g vs 15.5 g).
- Chianti Rufina has 100% more protein (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Chianti Rufina is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Lambrusco dell'Emilia Rosato lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Lambrusco dell'Emilia Rosato
Raisins, moût de raisins concentré, régulateurs d'acidité (acide malique (D, L-; L-)), conservateurs (sulfites, Acide ascorbique), stabilisants (gomme arabique)
Chianti Rufina
fermented grape juice
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lambrusco dell'Emilia Rosato or Chianti Rufina?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lambrusco dell'Emilia Rosato has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 73 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lambrusco dell'Emilia Rosato has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 15.5 g per 100 g.