Lambrusco vs Lambrusco dell'Emilia Rosato
Overall, Lambrusco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Lambrusco | Lambrusco dell'Emilia Rosato |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 11 kcal | 21 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lambrusco has 48% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 21 kcal).
- Lambrusco has 86% less sugar (0.6 g vs 4.5 g).
- Lambrusco is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Lambrusco dell'Emilia Rosato lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Lambrusco
Rotwein
Lambrusco dell'Emilia Rosato
Raisins, moût de raisins concentré, régulateurs d'acidité (acide malique (D, L-; L-)), conservateurs (sulfites, Acide ascorbique), stabilisants (gomme arabique)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lambrusco or Lambrusco dell'Emilia Rosato?
Overall, Lambrusco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lambrusco has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 21 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lambrusco has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.