Lambrusco dell'Emilia Rosato vs Teroldego rotaliano
Overall, Teroldego rotaliano has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lambrusco dell'Emilia Rosato | Teroldego rotaliano |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 21 kcal | 11 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Teroldego rotaliano has 48% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 21 kcal).
- Teroldego rotaliano has 86% less sugar (0.6 g vs 4.5 g).
- Teroldego rotaliano is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Lambrusco dell'Emilia Rosato lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Lambrusco dell'Emilia Rosato
Raisins, moût de raisins concentré, régulateurs d'acidité (acide malique (D, L-; L-)), conservateurs (sulfites, Acide ascorbique), stabilisants (gomme arabique)
Teroldego rotaliano
VINO ROSSO
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lambrusco dell'Emilia Rosato or Teroldego rotaliano?
Overall, Teroldego rotaliano has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Teroldego rotaliano has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 21 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Teroldego rotaliano has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.