Comparison

Lait écrémé en poudre vs Kaffeeweißer

Overall, Lait écrémé en poudre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLait écrémé en poudreKaffeeweißer
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 359 kcal 556 kcal
Fat 0.8 g 35 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 32 g
Sugars 52 g 9.8 g
Salt 1.1 g 0.9 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 36 g 2 g
Additives03
AllergensMilkEggs, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lait écrémé en poudre has 35% fewer calories (359 kcal vs 556 kcal).
  • Lait écrémé en poudre has 98% less fat (0.8 g vs 35 g).
  • Lait écrémé en poudre has 98% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 32 g).
  • Kaffeeweißer has 81% less sugar (9.8 g vs 52 g).
  • Lait écrémé en poudre has 94% more protein (36 g vs 2 g).
  • Lait écrémé en poudre is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Kaffeeweißer lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

Lait écrémé en poudre

_Lait_ en poudre écrémé (origine France). Peut contenir des traces de soja.

Kaffeeweißer

Glukosesirup, Kokosnussöl, Stabilisatoren (Kaliumphosphate, Natriumpolyphosphate), Milcheiweiß, Emulgator (Mono - und Diglyceride von Speisefettsäuren), Trennmittel (Siliciumdioxid)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lait écrémé en poudre or Kaffeeweißer?

Overall, Lait écrémé en poudre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lait écrémé en poudre has fewer calories: 359 kcal versus 556 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kaffeeweißer has less sugar: 9.8 g versus 52 g per 100 g.

More comparisons