Kaffeeweißer vs Leche en polvo desnatada
Overall, Leche en polvo desnatada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kaffeeweißer | Leche en polvo desnatada |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 556 kcal | 357 kcal |
| Fat | 35 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 32 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 9.8 g | 54.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 32.5 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Leche en polvo desnatada has 36% fewer calories (357 kcal vs 556 kcal).
- Leche en polvo desnatada has 97% less fat (1 g vs 35 g).
- Leche en polvo desnatada has 98% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 32 g).
- Kaffeeweißer has 82% less sugar (9.8 g vs 54.5 g).
- Kaffeeweißer has 32% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.3 g).
- Leche en polvo desnatada has 94% more protein (32.5 g vs 2 g).
- Leche en polvo desnatada is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Kaffeeweißer lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Kaffeeweißer
Glukosesirup, Kokosnussöl, Stabilisatoren (Kaliumphosphate, Natriumpolyphosphate), Milcheiweiß, Emulgator (Mono - und Diglyceride von Speisefettsäuren), Trennmittel (Siliciumdioxid)
Leche en polvo desnatada
leche en polvo desnatada
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kaffeeweißer or Leche en polvo desnatada?
Overall, Leche en polvo desnatada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Leche en polvo desnatada has fewer calories: 357 kcal versus 556 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kaffeeweißer has less sugar: 9.8 g versus 54.5 g per 100 g.