Comparison

L'Absolu Pavés de Rumsteck aux 3 poivres vs Beef Rump Steak

Overall, Beef Rump Steak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientL'Absolu Pavés de Rumsteck a...Beef Rump Steak
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 1
Calories 110 kcal 125 kcal
Fat 2.3 g 4.1 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 1.7 g
Sugars 0.7 g 0 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0.2 g 0 g
Protein 21 g 22 g
Additives40
AllergensNone listedBeef

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • L'Absolu Pavés de Rumsteck aux 3 poivres has 12% fewer calories (110 kcal vs 125 kcal).
  • L'Absolu Pavés de Rumsteck aux 3 poivres has 44% less fat (2.3 g vs 4.1 g).
  • L'Absolu Pavés de Rumsteck aux 3 poivres has 59% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Beef Rump Steak has no sugar, while L'Absolu Pavés de Rumsteck aux 3 poivres has 0.7 g.
  • Beef Rump Steak has 83% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Beef Rump Steak has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Beef Rump Steak is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Beef Rump Steak lists: Beef.

Ingredients

L'Absolu Pavés de Rumsteck aux 3 poivres

Viande bovine , eau, sucre, 3 poivres (poivre blanc, poivre noir, poivre vert, 0,2%), sel, acidifiants : acétates de sodium, acide citrique, citrate de potassium, arômes naturels, poivron, huile de tournesol, antioxydants : acide ascorbique, ascorbate de sodium.

Beef Rump Steak

Beef

FAQ

Which is healthier: L'Absolu Pavés de Rumsteck aux 3 poivres or Beef Rump Steak?

Overall, Beef Rump Steak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

L'Absolu Pavés de Rumsteck aux 3 poivres has fewer calories: 110 kcal versus 125 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Beef Rump Steak has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons