Kwas vs Kvass
Overall, Kwas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Kwas | Kvass |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 29 kcal | 37 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 6.2 g | 6.7 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 6 | 4 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kwas has 22% fewer calories (29 kcal vs 37 kcal).
Ingredients
Kwas
Wasser, Grundstoff, Zucker, ROGGEN, GERSTENMALZ-Extrakt, Wasser, Säuerungsmittel, Milchsäure, Zucker, Kohlensäure, Kümmel, Säuerungsmittel, Citronensäure, Konservierungsstoffe, Natriumbenzoat, Kaliumsorbat, Farbstoff, Ammoniumsulfit-Zuckerkulör, Hefe
Kvass
Water, sugar, barley malt, rye malt, glucose syrup, carbon dioxide, yeast, acid (citric acid), preservatives (potassium sorbate, sodium benzoate), hops.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kwas or Kvass?
Overall, Kwas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kwas has fewer calories: 29 kcal versus 37 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kwas has less sugar: 6.2 g versus 6.7 g per 100 g.