Kvass (Unfiltered) vs Live Kvas
Overall, Live Kvas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Kvass (Unfiltered) | Live Kvas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 37 kcal | 28 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 5.6 g | 5.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Live Kvas has 24% fewer calories (28 kcal vs 37 kcal).
- Live Kvas has 75% more protein (0.4 g vs 0.1 g).
- Only Kvass (Unfiltered) lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Kvass (Unfiltered)
Water, sugar, barley malt, rye malt, carbon dioxide, acidity regulator - lactic acid, citric acid, antioxidant-ascorbic acid.
Live Kvas
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kvass (Unfiltered) or Live Kvas?
Overall, Live Kvas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Live Kvas has fewer calories: 28 kcal versus 37 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kvass (Unfiltered) has less sugar: 5.6 g versus 5.8 g per 100 g.