Comparison
Krustenkandis vs Candico
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Krustenkandis | Candico |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 396 kcal | 400 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 99 g | 100 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Krustenkandis
Not available.
Candico
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Krustenkandis or Candico?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Krustenkandis has fewer calories: 396 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Krustenkandis has less sugar: 99 g versus 100 g per 100 g.