Comparison
Sucre brun vs Krustenkandis
Overall, Krustenkandis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucre brun | Krustenkandis |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 2 |
| Calories | 392 kcal | 396 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 98 g | 99 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Krustenkandis is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Sucre brun lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Sucre brun
Sucre, sirop de sucre inverti, colorant: caramel E150d. Contient des sulfites.
Krustenkandis
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucre brun or Krustenkandis?
Overall, Krustenkandis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucre brun has fewer calories: 392 kcal versus 396 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucre brun has less sugar: 98 g versus 99 g per 100 g.