Krustenkandis vs Rock Candy
Overall, Krustenkandis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Krustenkandis | Rock Candy |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 4 |
| Calories | 396 kcal | 384 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 99 g | 77 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Krustenkandis has no fat, while Rock Candy has 0.5 g.
- Rock Candy has 22% less sugar (77 g vs 99 g).
- Krustenkandis is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Krustenkandis
Not available.
Rock Candy
Sukker, glukosesirup, syre (sitronsyre), vegetabilsk fett (shea), aromaer, fargestoffer (curcumin, karmin, klorofyll-kobber-kompleks, indigotin, briljantblå FCF, vegetabilsk kull).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Krustenkandis or Rock Candy?
Overall, Krustenkandis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rock Candy has fewer calories: 384 kcal versus 396 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rock Candy has less sugar: 77 g versus 99 g per 100 g.