Comparison

Kip grilworst vs Achterham

Overall, Achterham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKip grilworstAchterham
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 220 kcal 102 kcal
Fat 16 g 2.1 g
Saturated fat 5.1 g 0.8 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.6 g
Salt 2.4 g 2.3 g
Fiber — 0.1 g
Protein 13 g 16 g
Additives58
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Achterham has 54% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 220 kcal).
  • Achterham has 87% less fat (2.1 g vs 16 g).
  • Achterham has 84% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 5.1 g).
  • Achterham has 19% more protein (16 g vs 13 g).

Ingredients

Kip grilworst

77% kippenvlees, water, aardappelzetmeel, kippenvet, maltodextrine, zout, specerijen, conserveermiddel (E262, E250), gehydrolyseerd maiseiwit, dextrose, emulgator (E451), lavasblad, gedroogde ui, gistextract, antioxidant (E301, E330), aroma's, natuurlijke aroma's, citrusvezel, kleurstof (F100) Provincialeweg 11 1506 MA ZAANDAM Nederland ah.nl/ah.be NL 28 457506227 EG

Achterham

78% VARKENSVLEES, WATER, ZUURTEREGELAAR (KALIUMACETATEN [E261], KALIUMLACTAAT [E326]), ZOUT, NATUURLIJKE AROMA'S, AARDAPPELZETMEEL, GLUCOSESTROOP, AROMA, DEXTROSE, STABILISATOR (CARRAGEEN [E407], DIFOSFATEN [E450], TRIFOSFATEN (E451), POLYFOSFATEN [E452]), GISTEXTRACT, ANTIOXIDANT (NATRIUMASCORBAAT [E301]), CONSERVEERMIDDEL (NATRIUMNITRIET (E250]), ROOK.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kip grilworst or Achterham?

Overall, Achterham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Achterham has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 220 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kip grilworst has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons