Comparison

Kettle Cooked Sea Salt Chips vs Chips à l’ancienne

Overall, Chips à l’ancienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Kettle Cooked Sea Salt Chips	Chips à l’ancienne
Nutri-Score	d	c
NOVA group	3	—
Calories	500 kcal	543 kcal
Fat	25 g	33.3 g
Saturated fat	3.6 g	3 g
Sugars	3.6 g	0.2 g
Salt	1.1 g	0.5 g
Fiber	7.1 g	—
Protein	7.1 g	0.9 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Kettle Cooked Sea Salt Chips has 25% less fat (25 g vs 33.3 g).
Chips à l’ancienne has 16% less saturated fat (3 g vs 3.6 g).
Chips à l’ancienne has 94% less sugar (0.2 g vs 3.6 g).
Chips à l’ancienne has 55% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
Kettle Cooked Sea Salt Chips has 87% more protein (7.1 g vs 0.9 g).
Chips à l’ancienne has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Kettle Cooked Sea Salt Chips

Potatoes, avocado oil, sea salt.

Chips à l’ancienne

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kettle Cooked Sea Salt Chips or Chips à l’ancienne?

Overall, Chips à l’ancienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kettle Cooked Sea Salt Chips has fewer calories: 500 kcal versus 543 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chips à l’ancienne has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Kettle Cooked Sea Salt C... vs Lay's Recette à l'ancien... Lay's Recette à l'ancien... vs Chips à l’ancienne Kettle Cooked Sea Salt C... vs 1936 Il Cartoccio Chips à l’ancienne vs 1936 Il Cartoccio Kettle Cooked Sea Salt C... vs Maxi Mic Chips à l’ancienne vs Maxi Mic Kettle Cooked Sea Salt C... vs Gut und Günstig Riffelch... Hickory BBQ vs Kettle Cooked Sea Salt C...