Comparison

Chips à l’ancienne vs 1936 Il Cartoccio

Overall, Chips à l’ancienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Better choice

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Chips à l’ancienne	1936 Il Cartoccio
Nutri-Score	c	d
NOVA group	—	3
Calories	543 kcal	489 kcal
Fat	33.3 g	25 g
Saturated fat	3 g	8.7 g
Sugars	0.2 g	0.5 g
Salt	0.5 g	1.4 g
Fiber	—	6.6 g
Protein	0.9 g	7.2 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

1936 Il Cartoccio has 25% less fat (25 g vs 33.3 g).
Chips à l’ancienne has 66% less saturated fat (3 g vs 8.7 g).
Chips à l’ancienne has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
Chips à l’ancienne has 64% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
1936 Il Cartoccio has 88% more protein (7.2 g vs 0.9 g).
Chips à l’ancienne has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Chips à l’ancienne

Not available.

1936 Il Cartoccio

Patate, oli vegetali (palma, girasole alto oleico), sale marino.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chips à l’ancienne or 1936 Il Cartoccio?

Overall, Chips à l’ancienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

1936 Il Cartoccio has fewer calories: 489 kcal versus 543 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chips à l’ancienne has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Lay's Recette à l'ancien... vs 1936 Il Cartoccio Lay's Recette à l'ancien... vs Chips à l’ancienne Maxi Mic vs 1936 Il Cartoccio Kettle Cooked Sea Salt C... vs 1936 Il Cartoccio Gut und Günstig Riffelch... vs 1936 Il Cartoccio Hickory BBQ vs 1936 Il Cartoccio Chips à l'ancienne vs 1936 Il Cartoccio Chips à l’ancienne vs Maxi Mic