Chips à l'ancienne vs 1936 Il Cartoccio
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chips à l'ancienne | 1936 Il Cartoccio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 553 kcal | 489 kcal |
| Fat | 37 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 3 g | 8.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 4.9 g | 6.6 g |
| Protein | 5.5 g | 7.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 1936 Il Cartoccio has 12% fewer calories (489 kcal vs 553 kcal).
- 1936 Il Cartoccio has 32% less fat (25 g vs 37 g).
- Chips à l'ancienne has 66% less saturated fat (3 g vs 8.7 g).
- Chips à l'ancienne has 36% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.4 g).
- 1936 Il Cartoccio has 26% more fiber (6.6 g vs 4.9 g).
- 1936 Il Cartoccio has 24% more protein (7.2 g vs 5.5 g).
- Chips à l'ancienne has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Chips à l'ancienne
Pommes de terre (origine France) 62,1%, huile de tournesol 37%, sel. Traces éventuelles de céréales contenant du gluten, lait, moutarde et céleri.
1936 Il Cartoccio
Patate, oli vegetali (palma, girasole alto oleico), sale marino.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chips à l'ancienne or 1936 Il Cartoccio?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
1936 Il Cartoccio has fewer calories: 489 kcal versus 553 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips à l'ancienne has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.