Comparison

Chips à l'ancienne vs Gut und Günstig Riffelchips Paprika

Overall, Chips à l'ancienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChips à l'ancienneGut und Günstig Riffelchips...
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 553 kcal 540 kcal
Fat 37 g 34 g
Saturated fat 3 g 15.6 g
Sugars 0.5 g 1.6 g
Salt 0.9 g 1.4 g
Fiber 4.9 g 4 g
Protein 5.5 g 6 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chips à l'ancienne has 81% less saturated fat (3 g vs 15.6 g).
  • Chips à l'ancienne has 69% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Chips à l'ancienne has 36% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Chips à l'ancienne has 18% more fiber (4.9 g vs 4 g).
  • Chips à l'ancienne has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Chips à l'ancienne is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Gut und Günstig Riffelchips Paprika lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Chips à l'ancienne

Pommes de terre (origine France) 62,1%, huile de tournesol 37%, sel. Traces éventuelles de céréales contenant du gluten, lait, moutarde et céleri.

Gut und Günstig Riffelchips Paprika

59% Kartoffeln, Palmöl, _Weizenmehl_, Speisesalz, Zucker, Paprikapulver, Gewürze, Hefepulver, natürliches Aroma, Hefeextrakt, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, Rauch,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chips à l'ancienne or Gut und Günstig Riffelchips Paprika?

Overall, Chips à l'ancienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gut und Günstig Riffelchips Paprika has fewer calories: 540 kcal versus 553 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chips à l'ancienne has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons