Comparison
Kettle Cooked Sea Salt Chips vs 1936 Il Cartoccio
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kettle Cooked Sea Salt Chips | 1936 Il Cartoccio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 500 kcal | 489 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 8.7 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 6.6 g |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 7.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kettle Cooked Sea Salt Chips has 59% less saturated fat (3.6 g vs 8.7 g).
- 1936 Il Cartoccio has 86% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.6 g).
Ingredients
Kettle Cooked Sea Salt Chips
Potatoes, avocado oil, sea salt.
1936 Il Cartoccio
Patate, oli vegetali (palma, girasole alto oleico), sale marino.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kettle Cooked Sea Salt Chips or 1936 Il Cartoccio?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
1936 Il Cartoccio has fewer calories: 489 kcal versus 500 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
1936 Il Cartoccio has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Lay's Recette à l'ancien... vs 1936 Il Cartoccio
Kettle Cooked Sea Salt C... vs Lay's Recette à l'ancien...
Maxi Mic vs 1936 Il Cartoccio
Chips à l’ancienne vs 1936 Il Cartoccio
Gut und Günstig Riffelch... vs 1936 Il Cartoccio
Hickory BBQ vs 1936 Il Cartoccio
Chips à l'ancienne vs 1936 Il Cartoccio
Kettle Cooked Sea Salt C... vs Maxi Mic