Kettle Cooked Sea Salt Chips vs Chips à l'ancienne
Overall, Chips à l'ancienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kettle Cooked Sea Salt Chips | Chips à l'ancienne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 500 kcal | 553 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 37 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 4.9 g |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kettle Cooked Sea Salt Chips has 32% less fat (25 g vs 37 g).
- Chips à l'ancienne has 16% less saturated fat (3 g vs 3.6 g).
- Chips à l'ancienne has 86% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.6 g).
- Kettle Cooked Sea Salt Chips has 31% more fiber (7.1 g vs 4.9 g).
- Kettle Cooked Sea Salt Chips has 23% more protein (7.1 g vs 5.5 g).
- Chips à l'ancienne has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kettle Cooked Sea Salt Chips
Potatoes, avocado oil, sea salt.
Chips à l'ancienne
Pommes de terre (origine France) 62,1%, huile de tournesol 37%, sel. Traces éventuelles de céréales contenant du gluten, lait, moutarde et céleri.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kettle Cooked Sea Salt Chips or Chips à l'ancienne?
Overall, Chips à l'ancienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kettle Cooked Sea Salt Chips has fewer calories: 500 kcal versus 553 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips à l'ancienne has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.