Comparison

KERRYGOLD ongezouten Ierse boter vs BERTOLLI smeren olijfolie vlootje

Overall, BERTOLLI smeren olijfolie vlootje has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKERRYGOLD ongezouten Ierse b...BERTOLLI smeren olijfolie vl...
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 2 4
Calories 748 kcal 531 kcal
Fat 82.5 g 59 g
Saturated fat 56 g 15 g
Sugars 0.7 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0.2 g
Fiber 1.4 g —
Protein 0.7 g 0.5 g
Additives03
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • BERTOLLI smeren olijfolie vlootje has 29% fewer calories (531 kcal vs 748 kcal).
  • BERTOLLI smeren olijfolie vlootje has 28% less fat (59 g vs 82.5 g).
  • BERTOLLI smeren olijfolie vlootje has 73% less saturated fat (15 g vs 56 g).
  • BERTOLLI smeren olijfolie vlootje has no sugar, while KERRYGOLD ongezouten Ierse boter has 0.7 g.
  • BERTOLLI smeren olijfolie vlootje has the better Nutri-Score.
  • KERRYGOLD ongezouten Ierse boter is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only KERRYGOLD ongezouten Ierse boter lists: Milk.

Ingredients

KERRYGOLD ongezouten Ierse boter

Room (Melk)

BERTOLLI smeren olijfolie vlootje

Plantaardige oliën (koolzaad, palm*, olijfolie (10%), zonnebloem), water, zout (0,2%), emulgatoren (lecithine, mono - en diglyceriden van vetzuren, natuurlijke aroma's, vitamine (A,D),

FAQ

Which is healthier: KERRYGOLD ongezouten Ierse boter or BERTOLLI smeren olijfolie vlootje?

Overall, BERTOLLI smeren olijfolie vlootje has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

BERTOLLI smeren olijfolie vlootje has fewer calories: 531 kcal versus 748 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

BERTOLLI smeren olijfolie vlootje has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons