Comparison

Kartoffelsalat Westfälische Art vs Kartoffelsalat

Overall, Kartoffelsalat Westfälische Art has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKartoffelsalat Westfälische...Kartoffelsalat
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 148 kcal 179 kcal
Fat 8.1 g 12 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 1 g
Sugars 6.1 g 4.5 g
Salt 1.2 g 1.1 g
Fiber — 1.3 g
Protein 1.4 g 2 g
Additives03
AllergensNone listedEggs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kartoffelsalat Westfälische Art has 17% fewer calories (148 kcal vs 179 kcal).
  • Kartoffelsalat Westfälische Art has 33% less fat (8.1 g vs 12 g).
  • Kartoffelsalat Westfälische Art has 40% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1 g).
  • Kartoffelsalat has 26% less sugar (4.5 g vs 6.1 g).
  • Kartoffelsalat has 30% more protein (2 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Only Kartoffelsalat lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

Kartoffelsalat Westfälische Art

Not available.

Kartoffelsalat

Kartoffeln 70%, Rapsöl, Invertzuckersirup, Wasser, Zwiebeln 3 %, Bauchspeck 2% (Schweinefleisch, Wasser, Speisesalz, Rauch), Branntweinessig, Eigelb, Speisesalz, Kräuter, Gewürze, Dextrose, Maltodextrin, Rauch, Säureregulator: Natriumacetate; Verdickungsmit tel: Xanthan; Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure. Bei Kühlung von +2°C bis +7°C min - destens haltbar bis: siehe Deckelrand Nährwertes pro 100g UNSER Brennwert 744 kJ/179 kcal GRÜNER Fett

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kartoffelsalat Westfälische Art or Kartoffelsalat?

Overall, Kartoffelsalat Westfälische Art has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kartoffelsalat Westfälische Art has fewer calories: 148 kcal versus 179 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kartoffelsalat has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 6.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons