Comparison

Kalbs Fond vs Marinade für koreanisches Fleischgericht Bulgogi

Overall, Kalbs Fond has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKalbs FondMarinade für koreanisches Fl...
Nutri-Score a e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 7 kcal 255 kcal
Fat 0 g 11 g
Saturated fat — 1.9 g
Sugars 0.6 g 35 g
Salt 0 g 4.9 g
Fiber — 4 g
Protein 0.5 g 2.9 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedGluten, Sesame seeds, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kalbs Fond has 97% fewer calories (7 kcal vs 255 kcal).
  • Kalbs Fond has no fat, while Marinade für koreanisches Fleischgericht Bulgogi has 11 g.
  • Kalbs Fond has 98% less sugar (0.6 g vs 35 g).
  • Kalbs Fond has no salt, while Marinade für koreanisches Fleischgericht Bulgogi has 4.9 g.
  • Marinade für koreanisches Fleischgericht Bulgogi has 83% more protein (2.9 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Kalbs Fond has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Marinade für koreanisches Fleischgericht Bulgogi is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Marinade für koreanisches Fleischgericht Bulgogi lists: Gluten, Sesame seeds, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Kalbs Fond

bouillon de veau (eau, viande de veau, viande de boeuf), glucose, sel, sucre, maltodextrine, arôme, extrait de levure,

Marinade für koreanisches Fleischgericht Bulgogi

Zucker, Sojasauce (Wasser, Sojabohnen, Salz, Zucker, Weizenmehl), Knoblauch, Sesamöl, Zwiebeln, Ingwer, schwarzer Pfeffer, Sesampaste

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kalbs Fond or Marinade für koreanisches Fleischgericht Bulgogi?

Overall, Kalbs Fond has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kalbs Fond has fewer calories: 7 kcal versus 255 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kalbs Fond has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 35 g per 100 g.

More comparisons