Comparison

Sauce Italienne 2 Fois 190 Grammes vs Kalbs Fond

Overall, Kalbs Fond has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSauce Italienne 2 Fois 190 G...Kalbs Fond
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 82 kcal 7 kcal
Fat 4.8 g 0 g
Saturated fat 1.6 g —
Sugars 4.9 g 0.6 g
Salt 1.1 g 0 g
Fiber 3 g —
Protein 3 g 0.5 g
Additives20
AllergensCelery, GlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kalbs Fond has 91% fewer calories (7 kcal vs 82 kcal).
  • Kalbs Fond has no fat, while Sauce Italienne 2 Fois 190 Grammes has 4.8 g.
  • Kalbs Fond has 88% less sugar (0.6 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Kalbs Fond has no salt, while Sauce Italienne 2 Fois 190 Grammes has 1.1 g.
  • Sauce Italienne 2 Fois 190 Grammes has 83% more protein (3 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Kalbs Fond has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Sauce Italienne 2 Fois 190 Grammes lists: Celery, Gluten.

Ingredients

Sauce Italienne 2 Fois 190 Grammes

Purée de tomates concentrée 80,2% - viande bovine précuite 4% (origine : France) - viande porcine précuite 4% (origine : France) - oignons 5 % - huile de tournesol - sel - amidon transformé de maïs - sucre - vin blanc - épices et plantes aromatiques (contient _céleri_) - acidifiant : acide lactique - arôme naturel (contient _blé_).

Kalbs Fond

bouillon de veau (eau, viande de veau, viande de boeuf), glucose, sel, sucre, maltodextrine, arôme, extrait de levure,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sauce Italienne 2 Fois 190 Grammes or Kalbs Fond?

Overall, Kalbs Fond has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kalbs Fond has fewer calories: 7 kcal versus 82 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kalbs Fond has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons