Kaasmakerij Passendale vs Fleur de Fagne
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kaasmakerij Passendale | Fleur de Fagne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 353 kcal | 345 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 31.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 20.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 16.4 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kaasmakerij Passendale has 29% more protein (23 g vs 16.4 g).
- Fleur de Fagne is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Kaasmakerij Passendale
LAIT de vache pasteurisé (sans lactose**), sel, ferments lactiques, coagulant microbien, colorant [E160b(ii)],
Fleur de Fagne
Lait de vache pasteurisé, sel, pressure fragments,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kaasmakerij Passendale or Fleur de Fagne?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fleur de Fagne has fewer calories: 345 kcal versus 353 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kaasmakerij Passendale has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.