Fromage à pâte dure vs Kaasmakerij Passendale
Overall, Fromage à pâte dure has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fromage à pâte dure | Kaasmakerij Passendale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 366 kcal | 353 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 29 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 21 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 33 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fromage à pâte dure has 10% less fat (26 g vs 29 g).
- Fromage à pâte dure has 14% less saturated fat (18 g vs 21 g).
- Kaasmakerij Passendale has 25% less salt (1.5 g vs 2 g).
- Fromage à pâte dure has 30% more protein (33 g vs 23 g).
- Fromage à pâte dure is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Fromage à pâte dure
_lait_, sel, coagulant, présure.
Kaasmakerij Passendale
LAIT de vache pasteurisé (sans lactose**), sel, ferments lactiques, coagulant microbien, colorant [E160b(ii)],
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fromage à pâte dure or Kaasmakerij Passendale?
Overall, Fromage à pâte dure has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kaasmakerij Passendale has fewer calories: 353 kcal versus 366 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fromage à pâte dure has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.