Comparison

Passendale Jong vs Fleur de Fagne

Overall, Passendale Jong has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Better choice
Passendale Jong

Passendale Jong

Passendale · 300 g
d
Fleur de Fagne

Fleur de Fagne

d NOVA 3

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPassendale JongFleur de Fagne
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — 3
Calories 353 kcal 345 kcal
Fat 29 g 31.1 g
Saturated fat 20 g 20.7 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 1.5 g 1.5 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 23 g 16.4 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Passendale Jong has 29% more protein (23 g vs 16.4 g).
  • Only Fleur de Fagne lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Passendale Jong

Not available.

Fleur de Fagne

Lait de vache pasteurisé, sel, pressure fragments,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Passendale Jong or Fleur de Fagne?

Overall, Passendale Jong has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fleur de Fagne has fewer calories: 345 kcal versus 353 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Passendale Jong has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Fleur de Fagne vs Oud Brugge blokjes Fromage à pâte dure vs Fleur de Fagne Fleur de Fagne vs Fromage AOP au lait past... Kaasmakerij Passendale vs Passendale Jong Passendale Jong vs Filière Qualité Carrefou... Fromage à pâte dure vs Passendale Jong Passendale Jong vs Fromage AOP au lait past... Passendale Jong vs Oud Brugge blokjes