Jus kiwi vs Zumo de naranja sin pulpa
Overall, Zumo de naranja sin pulpa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Jus kiwi | Zumo de naranja sin pulpa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 53 kcal | 50 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 11.6 g | 8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Zumo de naranja sin pulpa has 31% less sugar (8 g vs 11.6 g).
- Zumo de naranja sin pulpa has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Jus kiwi
Zumo y puré de manzana (43%), zumo de uva (30%), puré de kiwi (27%), extracto de alga espirulina y cártamo (0,1%).
Zumo de naranja sin pulpa
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Jus kiwi or Zumo de naranja sin pulpa?
Overall, Zumo de naranja sin pulpa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Zumo de naranja sin pulpa has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 53 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Zumo de naranja sin pulpa has less sugar: 8 g versus 11.6 g per 100 g.