Comparison

Zumo de melocotón uva vs Zumo de naranja sin pulpa

Overall, Zumo de naranja sin pulpa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Zumo de melocotón uva	Zumo de naranja sin pulpa
Nutri-Score	d	b
NOVA group	1	—
Calories	59 kcal	50 kcal
Fat	0 g	0.1 g
Saturated fat	0 g	0 g
Sugars	13 g	8 g
Salt	0 g	0 g
Fiber	0.8 g	—
Protein	0.5 g	0.7 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Zumo de naranja sin pulpa has 15% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 59 kcal).
Zumo de naranja sin pulpa has 38% less sugar (8 g vs 13 g).
Zumo de naranja sin pulpa has the better Nutri-Score.
Only Zumo de melocotón uva lists: None.

Ingredients

Zumo de melocotón uva

Puré de melocotón (55%), zumo de uva* (45%).

Zumo de naranja sin pulpa

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Zumo de melocotón uva or Zumo de naranja sin pulpa?

Overall, Zumo de naranja sin pulpa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Zumo de naranja sin pulpa has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 59 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Zumo de naranja sin pulpa has less sugar: 8 g versus 13 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Enjoy zumo tropical vs Zumo de melocotón uva Zumo de melocotón uva vs Jus kiwi Don simon naranja premiu... vs Zumo de melocotón uva Nectar de mango vs Zumo de melocotón uva Fresh maracuyá & chía vs Zumo de naranja sin pulp... Arándanos y uva vs Zumo de naranja sin pulp... Enjoy zumo tropical vs Zumo de naranja sin pulp... Jus kiwi vs Zumo de naranja sin pulp...