Comparison

Jumbo Ongezouten Kingsize Pinda's 350 g vs HAK Canellini Bonen 380g

Overall, HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientJumbo Ongezouten Kingsize Pi...HAK Canellini Bonen 380g
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group — 3
Calories 623 kcal 111 kcal
Fat 51.3 g 0.4 g
Saturated fat 8 g 0.1 g
Sugars 5.4 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0.2 g
Fiber 8.4 g 7.8 g
Protein 25 g 8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has 82% fewer calories (111 kcal vs 623 kcal).
  • HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has 99% less fat (0.4 g vs 51.3 g).
  • HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has 99% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 8 g).
  • HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has no sugar, while Jumbo Ongezouten Kingsize Pinda's 350 g has 5.4 g.
  • Jumbo Ongezouten Kingsize Pinda's 350 g has 68% more protein (25 g vs 8 g).
  • HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Jumbo Ongezouten Kingsize Pinda's 350 g

Pinda Zonnebloemolie

HAK Canellini Bonen 380g

cannellini bonen, water, zout, calciumchloride

FAQ

Which is healthier: Jumbo Ongezouten Kingsize Pinda's 350 g or HAK Canellini Bonen 380g?

Overall, HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has fewer calories: 111 kcal versus 623 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has less sugar: 0 g versus 5.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons