Jumbo Ongezouten Kingsize Pinda's 350 g vs HAK Canellini Bonen 380g
Overall, HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Jumbo Ongezouten Kingsize Pinda's 350 g
HAK Canellini Bonen 380g
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Jumbo Ongezouten Kingsize Pi... | HAK Canellini Bonen 380g |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 623 kcal | 111 kcal |
| Fat | 51.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 8 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 5.4 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 8.4 g | 7.8 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has 82% fewer calories (111 kcal vs 623 kcal).
- HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has 99% less fat (0.4 g vs 51.3 g).
- HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has 99% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 8 g).
- HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has no sugar, while Jumbo Ongezouten Kingsize Pinda's 350 g has 5.4 g.
- Jumbo Ongezouten Kingsize Pinda's 350 g has 68% more protein (25 g vs 8 g).
- HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Jumbo Ongezouten Kingsize Pinda's 350 g
Pinda Zonnebloemolie
HAK Canellini Bonen 380g
cannellini bonen, water, zout, calciumchloride
FAQ
Which is healthier: Jumbo Ongezouten Kingsize Pinda's 350 g or HAK Canellini Bonen 380g?
Overall, HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has fewer calories: 111 kcal versus 623 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has less sugar: 0 g versus 5.4 g per 100 g.