Chicken Burger vs HAK Canellini Bonen 380g
Overall, HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chicken Burger | HAK Canellini Bonen 380g |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 223 kcal | 111 kcal |
| Fat | 6.6 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 4.4 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 7.8 g |
| Protein | 13.9 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has 50% fewer calories (111 kcal vs 223 kcal).
- HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has 94% less fat (0.4 g vs 6.6 g).
- HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has 92% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.3 g).
- HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has no sugar, while Chicken Burger has 4.4 g.
- HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has 89% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.8 g).
- HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has 91% more fiber (7.8 g vs 0.7 g).
- Chicken Burger has 42% more protein (13.9 g vs 8 g).
- HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Chicken Burger
Not available.
HAK Canellini Bonen 380g
cannellini bonen, water, zout, calciumchloride
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chicken Burger or HAK Canellini Bonen 380g?
Overall, HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has fewer calories: 111 kcal versus 223 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.4 g per 100 g.