Comparison

Chicken Burger vs HAK Canellini Bonen 380g

Overall, HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChicken BurgerHAK Canellini Bonen 380g
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group — 3
Calories 223 kcal 111 kcal
Fat 6.6 g 0.4 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 0.1 g
Sugars 4.4 g 0 g
Salt 1.8 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0.7 g 7.8 g
Protein 13.9 g 8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has 50% fewer calories (111 kcal vs 223 kcal).
  • HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has 94% less fat (0.4 g vs 6.6 g).
  • HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has 92% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.3 g).
  • HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has no sugar, while Chicken Burger has 4.4 g.
  • HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has 89% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.8 g).
  • HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has 91% more fiber (7.8 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Chicken Burger has 42% more protein (13.9 g vs 8 g).
  • HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Chicken Burger

Not available.

HAK Canellini Bonen 380g

cannellini bonen, water, zout, calciumchloride

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chicken Burger or HAK Canellini Bonen 380g?

Overall, HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has fewer calories: 111 kcal versus 223 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons