Freeway cola vs Chicken Burger
Overall, Freeway cola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Freeway cola | Chicken Burger |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 39 kcal | 223 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 6.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 9.7 g | 4.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 13.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Freeway cola has 83% fewer calories (39 kcal vs 223 kcal).
- Freeway cola has no fat, while Chicken Burger has 6.6 g.
- Freeway cola has no saturated fat, while Chicken Burger has 1.3 g.
- Chicken Burger has 55% less sugar (4.4 g vs 9.7 g).
- Freeway cola has no salt, while Chicken Burger has 1.8 g.
- Chicken Burger has 100% more protein (13.9 g vs 0 g).
- Freeway cola has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Freeway cola
Not available.
Chicken Burger
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Freeway cola or Chicken Burger?
Overall, Freeway cola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Freeway cola has fewer calories: 39 kcal versus 223 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chicken Burger has less sugar: 4.4 g versus 9.7 g per 100 g.