Comparison

Freeway cola vs HAK Canellini Bonen 380g

Overall, HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Freeway cola	HAK Canellini Bonen 380g
Nutri-Score	b	a
NOVA group	—	3
Calories	39 kcal	111 kcal
Fat	0 g	0.4 g
Saturated fat	0 g	0.1 g
Sugars	9.7 g	0 g
Salt	0 g	0.2 g
Fiber	—	7.8 g
Protein	0 g	8 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Freeway cola has 65% fewer calories (39 kcal vs 111 kcal).
Freeway cola has no fat, while HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has 0.4 g.
HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has no sugar, while Freeway cola has 9.7 g.
HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has 100% more protein (8 g vs 0 g).
HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Freeway cola

Not available.

HAK Canellini Bonen 380g

cannellini bonen, water, zout, calciumchloride

FAQ

Which is healthier: Freeway cola or HAK Canellini Bonen 380g?

Overall, HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Freeway cola has fewer calories: 39 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

HAK Canellini Bonen 380g has less sugar: 0 g versus 9.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Freeway cola vs Serenata cocoa cream Rocket lollies vs Freeway cola Rocket lollies vs HAK Canellini Bonen 380g Freeway cola vs Chocodate Dark Chocolate Freeway cola vs Jumbo Ongezouten Kingsiz... Jus de gingembre vs Freeway cola Chocodate Dark Chocolate vs HAK Canellini Bonen 380g Jumbo Ongezouten Kingsiz... vs HAK Canellini Bonen 380g