Comparison

Juicy Cactus fruit vs Cranberry & Pumpkin Seed Vitamin Fruit Bar

Overall, Cranberry & Pumpkin Seed Vitamin Fruit Bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientJuicy Cactus fruitCranberry & Pumpkin Seed Vit...
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group — —
Calories 290 kcal 341 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 4 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 1 g
Sugars 62 g 36.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 6.5 g 14.9 g
Protein 1.6 g 8.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Juicy Cactus fruit has 15% fewer calories (290 kcal vs 341 kcal).
  • Juicy Cactus fruit has 88% less fat (0.5 g vs 4 g).
  • Juicy Cactus fruit has 90% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1 g).
  • Cranberry & Pumpkin Seed Vitamin Fruit Bar has 41% less sugar (36.5 g vs 62 g).
  • Cranberry & Pumpkin Seed Vitamin Fruit Bar has 56% more fiber (14.9 g vs 6.5 g).
  • Cranberry & Pumpkin Seed Vitamin Fruit Bar has 81% more protein (8.6 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Cranberry & Pumpkin Seed Vitamin Fruit Bar has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Juicy Cactus fruit

Not available.

Cranberry & Pumpkin Seed Vitamin Fruit Bar

Hurma, pirinç unu, hurma suyu, nohut unu, kabak çekirdeği %9, kurutulmuş turna yemişi %8, yulaf ezmesi, kakao tozu, kakao yağı, vitamin karışımı (C vitamini, çinko), propolis %0,06, doğal aroma verici %0,05.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Juicy Cactus fruit or Cranberry & Pumpkin Seed Vitamin Fruit Bar?

Overall, Cranberry & Pumpkin Seed Vitamin Fruit Bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Juicy Cactus fruit has fewer calories: 290 kcal versus 341 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cranberry & Pumpkin Seed Vitamin Fruit Bar has less sugar: 36.5 g versus 62 g per 100 g.

More comparisons