Jockey 3% de mg nature 100 g x 8 vs Fjord nature 125 g x 8
Overall, Jockey 3% de mg nature 100 g x 8 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Jockey 3% de mg nature 100 g... | Fjord nature 125 g x 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 72 kcal | 118 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 7 g |
| Sugars | 4.4 g | 3.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | — |
| Protein | 6.9 g | 3.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Jockey 3% de mg nature 100 g x 8 has 39% fewer calories (72 kcal vs 118 kcal).
- Jockey 3% de mg nature 100 g x 8 has 70% less fat (3 g vs 10 g).
- Jockey 3% de mg nature 100 g x 8 has 70% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 7 g).
- Fjord nature 125 g x 8 has 11% less sugar (3.9 g vs 4.4 g).
- Jockey 3% de mg nature 100 g x 8 has 55% more protein (6.9 g vs 3.1 g).
- Jockey 3% de mg nature 100 g x 8 has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Jockey 3% de mg nature 100 g x 8
Fromage blanc (64,9%) (LAIT), LAIT écrémé, crème (LAIT), poudre de LAIT écrémé, protéines de LAIT, ferments lactiques (LAIT), vitamine D
Fjord nature 125 g x 8
LAIT entier, crème (LAIT), protéines de LAIT, ferments lactiques (LAIT)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Jockey 3% de mg nature 100 g x 8 or Fjord nature 125 g x 8?
Overall, Jockey 3% de mg nature 100 g x 8 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Jockey 3% de mg nature 100 g x 8 has fewer calories: 72 kcal versus 118 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fjord nature 125 g x 8 has less sugar: 3.9 g versus 4.4 g per 100 g.