Jambon cuit supérieur vs Jambon cuit supérieur
Overall, Jambon cuit supérieur has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Jambon cuit supérieur | Jambon cuit supérieur |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 138 kcal | 116 kcal |
| Fat | 6.3 g | 3.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 19.9 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Jambon cuit supérieur has 16% fewer calories (116 kcal vs 138 kcal).
- Jambon cuit supérieur has 48% less fat (3.3 g vs 6.3 g).
- Jambon cuit supérieur has 52% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 2.3 g).
- Jambon cuit supérieur has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Jambon cuit supérieur
Jambon de porc (origine France), sel, bouillon de porc (extrait de porc), arômes naturels, dextrose, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium, conservateur : nitrite de sodium.
Jambon cuit supérieur
*JAMBON DE PORC (84% - ORIGINE FRANCE), *COUENNE DE PORC (4% - ORIGINE FRANCE), EAU, SEL FIN, #SUCRE DE CANNE, #ARÔME NATUREL DE CITRON, #ARÔME NATUREL DE CAROUBE (PRÉSENCE NATURELLE DE POLYPHENOLS), *EXTRAIT DE LEVURE, ANTIOXYDANT: ACIDE ASCORBIQUE, BOUILLON DÉSHYDRATÉ BIO (CAROTTE, OIGNON, POIREAU, AIL, ROMARIN, POIVRE). TRACES POSSIBLES DE GLUTEN LACTOSE, DEUF ET SULFITE.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Jambon cuit supérieur or Jambon cuit supérieur?
Overall, Jambon cuit supérieur has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Jambon cuit supérieur has fewer calories: 116 kcal versus 138 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Jambon cuit supérieur has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.