Comparison

Jalapeno Beef Sticks vs Shredded beef suet

Overall, Jalapeno Beef Sticks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientJalapeno Beef SticksShredded beef suet
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 303 kcal 816 kcal
Fat 21.9 g 85.2 g
Saturated fat 9.4 g 40.6 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 3 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0.6 g
Protein 31.3 g 1.7 g
Additives10
AllergensCeleryGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Jalapeno Beef Sticks has 63% fewer calories (303 kcal vs 816 kcal).
  • Jalapeno Beef Sticks has 74% less fat (21.9 g vs 85.2 g).
  • Jalapeno Beef Sticks has 77% less saturated fat (9.4 g vs 40.6 g).
  • Jalapeno Beef Sticks has no sugar, while Shredded beef suet has 0.5 g.
  • Shredded beef suet has 97% less salt (0.1 g vs 3 g).
  • Shredded beef suet has 100% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0 g).
  • Jalapeno Beef Sticks has 95% more protein (31.3 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Shredded beef suet is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Jalapeno Beef Sticks lists: Celery.
  • Only Shredded beef suet lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Jalapeno Beef Sticks

Grass-fed and finished beef, water, encapsulated lactic acid, sea salt, jalapeño peppers, cultured celery powder (celery powder, sea salt), cherry powder, black pepper, red pepper, garlic powder, coriander, beef collagen casing.

Shredded beef suet

Beef Fat (85%), Wheat Flour (with added Calcium, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Jalapeno Beef Sticks or Shredded beef suet?

Overall, Jalapeno Beef Sticks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Jalapeno Beef Sticks has fewer calories: 303 kcal versus 816 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Jalapeno Beef Sticks has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons