Comparison

Original Beef Sticks vs Shredded beef suet

Overall, Original Beef Sticks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOriginal Beef SticksShredded beef suet
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 313 kcal 816 kcal
Fat 21.9 g 85.2 g
Saturated fat 9.4 g 40.6 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 3 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0.6 g
Protein 31.3 g 1.7 g
Additives10
AllergensCeleryGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Original Beef Sticks has 62% fewer calories (313 kcal vs 816 kcal).
  • Original Beef Sticks has 74% less fat (21.9 g vs 85.2 g).
  • Original Beef Sticks has 77% less saturated fat (9.4 g vs 40.6 g).
  • Original Beef Sticks has no sugar, while Shredded beef suet has 0.5 g.
  • Shredded beef suet has 97% less salt (0.1 g vs 3 g).
  • Shredded beef suet has 100% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0 g).
  • Original Beef Sticks has 95% more protein (31.3 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Shredded beef suet is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Original Beef Sticks lists: Celery.
  • Only Shredded beef suet lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Original Beef Sticks

grass fed beef, water, encapsulated lactic acid, sea salt, cultured celery powder, celery powder, salt, garlic, cherry powder, black pepper, red pepper, garlic powder, coriander, stuffed in a beef collagen casing

Shredded beef suet

Beef Fat (85%), Wheat Flour (with added Calcium, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Original Beef Sticks or Shredded beef suet?

Overall, Original Beef Sticks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Original Beef Sticks has fewer calories: 313 kcal versus 816 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Original Beef Sticks has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons