Italian mixed fruit sorbet vs Ricotta con Pere e gocce de cioccolato
Overall, Italian mixed fruit sorbet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Italian mixed fruit sorbet
Ricotta con Pere e gocce de cioccolato
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Italian mixed fruit sorbet | Ricotta con Pere e gocce de... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 124 kcal | 173 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 7.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 3.9 g |
| Sugars | 29 g | 22 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 3.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Italian mixed fruit sorbet has 28% fewer calories (124 kcal vs 173 kcal).
- Italian mixed fruit sorbet has no fat, while Ricotta con Pere e gocce de cioccolato has 7.4 g.
- Italian mixed fruit sorbet has no saturated fat, while Ricotta con Pere e gocce de cioccolato has 3.9 g.
- Ricotta con Pere e gocce de cioccolato has 24% less sugar (22 g vs 29 g).
- Italian mixed fruit sorbet has no salt, while Ricotta con Pere e gocce de cioccolato has 0.7 g.
- Ricotta con Pere e gocce de cioccolato has 89% more protein (3.6 g vs 0.4 g).
- Italian mixed fruit sorbet has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Italian mixed fruit sorbet
Not available.
Ricotta con Pere e gocce de cioccolato
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Italian mixed fruit sorbet or Ricotta con Pere e gocce de cioccolato?
Overall, Italian mixed fruit sorbet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Italian mixed fruit sorbet has fewer calories: 124 kcal versus 173 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricotta con Pere e gocce de cioccolato has less sugar: 22 g versus 29 g per 100 g.