Comparison

Hirtenkäse Traditionell, 60% Fett I. tr. vs Fromage de chèvre en saumure

Overall, Fromage de chèvre en saumure has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHirtenkäse Traditionell, 60%...Fromage de chèvre en saumure
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group — 3
Calories 328 kcal 234 kcal
Fat 30 g 19.3 g
Saturated fat 20.3 g 13.9 g
Sugars 1.8 g 1.6 g
Salt 2.8 g 2.5 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 13 g 13.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fromage de chèvre en saumure has 29% fewer calories (234 kcal vs 328 kcal).
  • Fromage de chèvre en saumure has 36% less fat (19.3 g vs 30 g).
  • Fromage de chèvre en saumure has 32% less saturated fat (13.9 g vs 20.3 g).
  • Only Fromage de chèvre en saumure lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Hirtenkäse Traditionell, 60% Fett I. tr.

Durchschnittliche Nährwerte/ Besin değerleri / Contain approximately/Contiennent en moyenne per 100g Portion 30g GOA Brennwert/Enerji / Energy/

Fromage de chèvre en saumure

Lait de chèvre pasteurisé, sel, présure microbienne, ferments lactiques (lait).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Hirtenkäse Traditionell, 60% Fett I. tr. or Fromage de chèvre en saumure?

Overall, Fromage de chèvre en saumure has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fromage de chèvre en saumure has fewer calories: 234 kcal versus 328 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fromage de chèvre en saumure has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons