Hirtenkäse Traditionell, 60% Fett I. tr. vs Ziegenkäse in Salzlake, 50 % Fett
Overall, Ziegenkäse in Salzlake, 50 % Fett has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Hirtenkäse Traditionell, 60% Fett I. tr.
Ziegenkäse in Salzlake, 50 % Fett
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hirtenkäse Traditionell, 60%... | Ziegenkäse in Salzlake, 50 %... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 328 kcal | 234 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 19.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 20.3 g | 13.9 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 2.8 g | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 13.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ziegenkäse in Salzlake, 50 % Fett has 29% fewer calories (234 kcal vs 328 kcal).
- Ziegenkäse in Salzlake, 50 % Fett has 36% less fat (19.3 g vs 30 g).
- Ziegenkäse in Salzlake, 50 % Fett has 32% less saturated fat (13.9 g vs 20.3 g).
- Only Ziegenkäse in Salzlake, 50 % Fett lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Hirtenkäse Traditionell, 60% Fett I. tr.
Durchschnittliche Nährwerte/ Besin değerleri / Contain approximately/Contiennent en moyenne per 100g Portion 30g GOA Brennwert/Enerji / Energy/
Ziegenkäse in Salzlake, 50 % Fett
Pasteurisierte _Ziegenmilch_, Speisesalz, mikrobielles Lab, Milchsäurekulturen.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hirtenkäse Traditionell, 60% Fett I. tr. or Ziegenkäse in Salzlake, 50 % Fett?
Overall, Ziegenkäse in Salzlake, 50 % Fett has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ziegenkäse in Salzlake, 50 % Fett has fewer calories: 234 kcal versus 328 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ziegenkäse in Salzlake, 50 % Fett has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.