Hirsch-Edelgulasch vs Civet de chevreuil
Overall, Civet de chevreuil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hirsch-Edelgulasch | Civet de chevreuil |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 105 kcal | 95 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 2.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 6 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, Vin rouge |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Civet de chevreuil has 58% less fat (2.1 g vs 5 g).
- Civet de chevreuil has 92% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 2.4 g).
- Hirsch-Edelgulasch has 63% less sugar (1.5 g vs 4 g).
- Civet de chevreuil has 20% less salt (1.6 g vs 2 g).
- Civet de chevreuil has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Civet de chevreuil lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, Vin rouge.
Ingredients
Hirsch-Edelgulasch
Not available.
Civet de chevreuil
produit à base de viande de chevreuil (viande de chevreuil 43% (Europe) eau, vin rouge (avec antioxydant (E 220 sulfitel, mélange de condiments (sel de cuisine, amidon de mais cireux modifié [E 14221, sirop de glucose déshydraté, correcteur d'acidité (E 500 épices huile de colzal, vinaigre de vin rouge), eau, vin rouge (avec antioxydant (E 220 sulfite). champignons (champignons de Paris, chanterelles). petits oignons, Aceto Balsamico di Modena IGP (vinaigre de vin, moût de raisin concentré), extrait de viande de baeuf, sucre, huile de colza, confiture d'airelles (airelles, sucre, sirop de glucose), amidon de mais cireux modifié (E 1422) colorant (E 150d), extraits d'épices, vinaigre de vin rouge, sel de cuisine iodé, concentré de jus d'orange, sel de cuisine, acidifiant (E 330), mélasse, sirop de glucose déshydraté, correcteur d'acidité (E 500), épaississant (E 415), épices. Contient de l'alcool.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hirsch-Edelgulasch or Civet de chevreuil?
Overall, Civet de chevreuil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Civet de chevreuil has fewer calories: 95 kcal versus 105 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hirsch-Edelgulasch has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 4 g per 100 g.