High-Protein-Pudding - Chocolate Flavour vs High Protein Chocolate Mousse
Overall, High Protein Chocolate Mousse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
High-Protein-Pudding - Chocolate Flavour
High Protein Chocolate Mousse
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | High-Protein-Pudding - Choco... | High Protein Chocolate Mouss... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 76 kcal | 74 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 5 | 5 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Milk | Milk, Sahne |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- High Protein Chocolate Mousse has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
- Only High-Protein-Pudding - Chocolate Flavour lists: Eggs.
- Only High Protein Chocolate Mousse lists: Sahne.
Ingredients
High-Protein-Pudding - Chocolate Flavour
Entrahmte MILCH, MILCHEIWEISS 8,0%, SAHNE, Kakaopulver 1,7%, fettarmes Kakaopulver 0,2%, modifizierte Stärke, Laktase, Verdickungsmittel (Carrageen, E466), Süßungsmittel (E 950, Sucralose), natürliches Aroma.
High Protein Chocolate Mousse
entrahmte Milch, fettarmes Kakaopulver 4%, Sahne, Sojeeiweißkonzentrat, modifizierte Stärke, natürliches Aroma, Verdickungsmittel (Carrageen, Guarkernmehl), Süßungsmittel (Acesulfam K, Sucralose)
FAQ
Which is healthier: High-Protein-Pudding - Chocolate Flavour or High Protein Chocolate Mousse?
Overall, High Protein Chocolate Mousse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
High Protein Chocolate Mousse has fewer calories: 74 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
High-Protein-Pudding - Chocolate Flavour has less sugar: 4 g versus 4 g per 100 g.