Comparison
Helmelk 3,5% vs Amul Taaza Milky Milk
Overall, Helmelk 3,5% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Helmelk 3,5% | Amul Taaza Milky Milk |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 64 kcal | 62 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 3.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 4.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Helmelk 3,5% has 14% more protein (3.5 g vs 3 g).
Ingredients
Helmelk 3,5%
Helmelk
Amul Taaza Milky Milk
PASTEURISED HOMOGENISED TONED MILK
FAQ
Which is healthier: Helmelk 3,5% or Amul Taaza Milky Milk?
Overall, Helmelk 3,5% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Amul Taaza Milky Milk has fewer calories: 62 kcal versus 64 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Helmelk 3,5% has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.